|
Save 45% when you buy the CEO Series. It covers the ten core business processes and comes with nine fully-editable manuals for:
|
||
Understanding Corrective and Preventive Actions
Corrective and Preventive Actions are key elements to a Quality Management System (QMS) that is focused on Continual Improvement and Customer Satisfaction. Indeed, any ISO 9000 type QMS should have this type of focus, unfortunately many do not.
It is important to properly use these two sub-systems when building a new QMS based on any quality standard, or revising an existing QMS. In order to do this, one must understand the difference between Corrective and Preventive Action.
Past Vs. Future
Simply put, Corrective Action is based on a nonconformance event that has happened in the past. Preventive Action is based on preventing a nonconformance event in the future. Both are similar procedurally, but with the focus as described. Together, Corrective and Preventive Actions—typically referred to as CAPA (pronounced cap-uh)—are integral parts of a continuous improvement program.
Both sub-systems require some type of a log to record each event; a Corrective Action Log and a Preventive Action Log. Each Corrective and Preventive Action will typically have a form that is used to record the details of the activity performed to satisfy the event; A Corrective Action Request (CAR, pronounced car, as in an automobile) and a Preventive Action Request (PAR, pronounced like the golf term, par).
- Edward de Bono
Corrective Actions
Too often a company will fix a problem in their business process, say a customer complaint or product return, after the problem has occurred. This is typically product or event focused. Then the company will look at what they’ve done and say, “Well if we revise our shop router or procedure, this will not happen again.” They will label this second phase as Preventive Action.
While it is a future thinking type of activity, it is still Corrective Action because it is based on solving a problem that has already happened. A Corrective Action needs to focus on the Quality System, so in this example the systemic action taken is the revision of the shop router or procedure. This is Corrective Action.
Preventive Actions
Preventive Action activities must stand alone and not focus on past events. For example: Company XYZ has a Preventive Maintenance management program that requires manual data entry. It is working fine and there have not been any problems. However, it takes a lot of time to manage and does have a high potential for error or lost records. XYZ decides to purchase Preventive Maintenance software to manage this activity. Since the purchase is not based on problems that have happened and is focused on process control or making an improvement to the QMS, it is a Preventive Action.
A functional Quality Management System should record and complete many more CAR’s than PAR’s. On an annual basis, a company may record only a few Preventive Action activities, while in the Corrective Action log many dozens of events are listed.
For audit purposes, a handful of Preventive Action events will demonstrate that this important part of the QMS is functional. A primary source of Preventive Action activities is the Management Review process. Although the Management Representative, or Manager responsible for the CAPA system, can also initiate and record Preventive Action activities.
Improved Business Processes
As one of the key elements to a QMS that will lead to improved processes, with a focus on continual improvements, it is important to use the CAPA system. After all, is the goal to get a plaque on the lobby, or to have a viable and improving business?
To learn more about implementing continuous process improvement within your organization, attend the next improvement class How to Align a System of People and Processes for Results . Or, Learn How to Create Well-Defined Processes and to document processes.
ISO 9000 Quality Auditor classes are forming now for Internal Auditor or Lead Auditor. Call for information on having your own private in-house classes today.
Related Articles:
This and more articles like this can be found at www.bizmanualz.com. This article may be reprinted freely as long as this resource box is left intact.











March 19th, 2007 at 4:00 am
I very happy about the method being used I have learn a lot about business process.
The is one thing that its not mention on how to write a letter to the following in terms of business:
The supplier refund or credit note or standard letter to reissue the correct invoices
How to write good letter to the CEO or CFO according to your findings on business improvement
How to motivate staff to process information correctly
May 7th, 2009 at 5:05 am
Hi,
Can anyone tell me in CA/PA Log against any issue . Can we have Corrective Action as well as Preventive action.
For example: No Organization wide central repository for sharing project’s work / Documents. Will there be a corrective as well as preventive action for this
Looking forward for your views on this. Do reply
Regards
June 17th, 2009 at 3:30 pm
A corrective action is in response to an audit finding, customer complaint, defect, nonconformance, or something that has alerted you to a problem that has occurred. If the problem has not occurred as a result of the above, then it is a preventive action.
In the example you site, if the company has a policy on keeping a central repository then it is a nonconformance. The lack of a central repository fails to conform to company policy XXXX. This would be a corrective action to bring the situation into conformance. If you do not have a policy but think that a central repository is a good idea to prevent… then it would be a preventive action to prevent the occurance of…
Note that ISO does not require a central repository so it is not an audit finding under ISO unless your document control procedure requires a central repository. ISO requires document control but it is up to you to define the control mechanisms.