How to Get Buy-In to Ensure Results
| by Bizmanualz Editor |
Part 4 of a four-part series
Last week, we discussed process improvement half-life, or how long it should take to achieve our target objectives. We also introduced what other resources we need to build our action plan. What’s left? In order to achieve your objectives for real process improvement you will need to change the business rules, incentives, and measurements and empower employees to get involved in the process of improvement. We will need their buy-in to change the culture and change the results.
Business Measures as Culture
What you measure creates the culture of your organization. People are generally good and want to do the right thing. Even when employees are apparently making bad decisions they generally think they are making good decisions. People do things for a reason. If we measure the wrong things we most likely will get the wrong results and make bad decisions in the process. If you want to change the culture of your organization then you will need to change the measurements that your organization uses.
Business Measures Affect Behavior
Measurement affects behavior in a profound way. Remember last week when we discussed business metrics we were trying to focus on the key metrics that could be used to drive the business results. Our example focused on inventory turns. In a manufacturing business inventory turns is one of, if not the most critical factors that drives performance. Yet when we go into a business we typically find the plant manager focused on asset utilization instead of inventory turns. What’s going on here?
There is a false belief that in order to generate the highest return on investment; you must keep all of these assets (investments in plant, machines, and labor) working at 100% capacity. Plant manager’s are typically compensated on their ability to achieve the highest asset utilization possible, even if that means a large build up in inventory or keeping the line running while defects are occurring.
What’s really going on is that the plant manager is sub-optimizing by elevating one element in the business, manufacturing, above all other elements, like the cash cycle or quality. The plant manager’s behavior is driven by the metrics used to measure performance. We need to change how the plant manager measures results.
[Note: To increase your return on assets you only need to focus on those assets that are constraining your manufacturing cycle. Only your constraints need to be at 100% utilization, all others can be at something lower than 100%.]
People Don’t Create Defects, Systems Do
Systems are made of up of our objectives, metrics, policies and procedures. If we set the wrong objectives, use the wrong metrics and document the wrong things, then we will get the wrong results. Yet we have a tendency to blame the people. The great quality leader W. Edwards Deming said, “People don’t create defects – systems do”. The management procedures you use make up your management system.
![]() |
“Public sentiment is everything. With it, nothing can fail. Without it, nothing can succeed.” Abraham Lincoln, |
|---|
Gaining Understanding, Commitment, and Action
Buy-in is the process of gaining people’s understanding, commitment, and action in support of your goals. Without buy-in you are almost certain to fail. You can’t just dictate results. People will resist and even try to stop your program. After all, without buy-in you have not really convinced anyone that it is in their interest to participate. How do we do this?
Strategic Stories of a Positive Future
Use stories. The best way to achieve buy-in is to use strategic stories of a positive future. In other words, strategically design, target, and deliver a strategic story that projects a positive future. It is all about the listener. They need to know what’s in it for them. Address their agendas. Present your goals from their perspective and you are halfway to achieving your goals already.
For example: Let’s say your strategy is process improvement to build a competitive advantage. We know that if we improve process performance (i.e., increase inventory turns), we increase capacity, which is good for the company.
However, the employees think increased capacity will lead to layoffs and fewer jobs, so they resist your efforts to improve processes. This is a classic buy-in problem that we see all the time.
The Solution: You need to present how you plan to use the increased capacity to sell more products and not just cut expenses to realize the improvement. You need to create a strategic story about new products under development or opening new markets that will require increased capacity.
Paint a picture of a positive future that increasing sales and decreasing costs will bring the company — new job opportunities, higher pay, or continued employment in a competitive market.
Buy-In Ensures Good Results
This week, we learned that to set objectives for real process improvement, we need to change the business rules, incentives, and measurements used within the organization. To ensure the changes are effective, we need everyone’s buy-in to the change program. Only if you empower employees to get involved in the process of improvement can you truly realize the goals and objectives you set.
Learn more about process design, implementation and continuous improvement with a How to Create Well-Defined Processes class.
Part 1: How to Transform Objectives into Results?
Part 2: Identify Business Metrics and Business Situations to Drive Results
Part 3: How Much Time is Needed for Process Improvement
Part 4: How to Get Buy-in to Ensure Results
Categories:
Business Management & Operations • Strategic Process Improvement
Tags:
Business Process Improvement • Buy-In • Cash Cycle • Communications Strategy • Continuous Improvement • inventory turns • management systems • Policies and Procedures • process design • Well-Defined Processes
Related Articles:
Originally published in 2005 by Bizmanualz, Inc. under the title How to Get Buy-In to Ensure Results. All rights reserved. Reproduction permitted with attribution only. www.bizmanualz.com









February 3rd, 2007 at 2:24 am
When I clicked on “employee empowerment” words, it could not get me the elaboration. May be I would like to share my views which could be of relevance to the readers of BIZMANUALZ.
Empowerment is conventionally understood as having entrusted with the authority to perform or undertake a task and hence is seen as something very similar to delegation. However true employee empowerment means that we ensure “Competent Influence” of every employee or the team to affect the process owned by her/him/them. To build the first element of empowerment the organization along with the employee(s) should evaluate scientifically as to which competency gaps to we need to bridge so that one is able to perform her/his role in an effective way. The second element namely “influence” is enabled through not only by defining very clearly the roles and responsibilities but by also ensuring that the “process Owner” is adequately motivated to influence the process so that the process gets managed well and is also improved by the owner in a proactive way.
May be these input would help your readers suitably.
Regards,
Your loyal reader,
Sanjay Limaye
September 28th, 2010 at 6:11 am
I appreciate the contribution of Sanjay Limaye but would like him/her to define the word motivation as used by him/her. This is in the light of the fact that motivation is of different kinds with no boundries. Therefore self motivation is very important if an employee must succeed.
Regards,
Joel Ighorodhe
A Nigerian Reader.