What Does Mercantilism Mean?

The article titled “The Impact of Mercantilism on Trade and Economic Policies” delves into the historical influence of mercantilism on various aspects of international trade and economic policies. Mercantilism, a dominant economic theory in the 16th to 18th centuries, emphasized a nation’s accumulation of wealth through a favorable balance of trade.

This article explores how the principles of mercantilism shaped trade practices, industrialization, and government interventions, while also examining its long-term impact on global economic systems. By providing a comprehensive analysis of mercantilism’s effects on trade and economic policies, this article aims to enhance understanding of the historical context and dynamics that have shaped contemporary economic theories and practices.

Overview of Mercantilism

Definition of Mercantilism

Mercantilism is an economic and trade policy that emerged in Europe during the 16th to 18th centuries. It is characterized by a strong focus on increasing a nation’s wealth and power through government control of the economy and trade. Under mercantilism, countries pursued policies aimed at promoting domestic industry, limiting imports, and encouraging exports.

Historical Context of Mercantilism

Mercantilism developed in a time when nations were in fierce competition for wealth and resources. It was an era marked by colonial expansion, with European powers establishing colonies in different parts of the world to extract resources and establish trade networks. Mercantilism provided a framework for these nations to maximize their economic gains and secure their dominance in the global arena.

Principles of Mercantilism

There are several key principles that form the foundation of mercantilism:

  1. Balancing Trade: Mercantilists believed that a country should strive to maintain a positive balance of trade, meaning it should export more than it imports. This was seen as a way to accumulate wealth and ensure a favorable trade position.
  2. Accumulation of Bullion: Another important principle of mercantilism was the accumulation of precious metals, particularly gold and silver. It was believed that the possession of bullion gave a nation economic power and enabled it to pursue its political goals.
  3. Promotion of Domestic Industries: Mercantilists strongly advocated for policies that supported and protected domestic industries. This involved providing subsidies, grants, and monopolies to encourage growth and competitiveness of homegrown businesses.
  4. Colonialism and Exploitation: Mercantilism was closely tied to colonialism, as it provided a means for nations to exploit their colonies for resources and markets. The colonies served as sources of raw materials and captive markets for finished goods.

Trade Policies under Mercantilism

Focus on Export Promotion

Under mercantilism, governments adopted policies aimed at boosting exports. This involved providing subsidies to exporters, imposing restrictions on foreign competition, and actively promoting domestic industries that had export potential. The idea was to generate a trade surplus, increase the inflow of precious metals, and strengthen the country’s economic position.

Import Restrictions and Tariffs

Mercantilist nations also implemented policies to restrict imports. High tariffs, import licenses, and outright bans were common measures employed to protect domestic industries from foreign competition. This allowed domestic producers to enjoy a favorable market environment and ensured the growth and profitability of domestic industries.

Colonialism and Mercantilism

Colonialism played a central role in mercantilist policies. European powers established colonies throughout the world to secure sources of raw materials and create captive markets for their goods. The colonies were expected to provide resources to the mother country, while serving as exclusive markets for finished products. This arrangement allowed mercantilist nations to maintain a favorable balance of trade and accumulate wealth.

Impact of Mercantilism on Economic Policies

Development of Mercantile Economies

Mercantilism laid the groundwork for the development of mercantile economies, characterized by state intervention and regulation of economic activities. Governments took an active role in promoting industries, protecting domestic production, and monitoring international trade. This helped in the establishment of strong and influential national economies.

State Intervention in Markets

Mercantilism emphasized the role of the state in economic affairs. Governments enacted policies to regulate markets, enforce trade restrictions, and provide subsidies and protection to specific industries. State intervention was seen as necessary to promote national interests and ensure the accumulation of wealth.

Creation of National Wealth

One of the main objectives of mercantilism was to create national wealth. The focus on trade surpluses, accumulation of bullion, and promotion of domestic industries all contributed to the accumulation of wealth at the national level. This allowed countries to invest in infrastructure, military power, and colonial expansion, further strengthening their economic and political positions.

Positive Effects of Mercantilism on Trade

Increase in National Wealth

One of the positive effects of mercantilism was the increase in national wealth. By pursuing policies that favored exports and restricted imports, countries were able to generate trade surpluses and accumulate valuable resources such as gold and silver. This increased national wealth provided the means for governments to invest in infrastructure, finance wars, and pursue colonial expansion.

Expansion of Employment Opportunities

Mercantilism also led to the expansion of employment opportunities. The emphasis on promoting domestic industries and protecting them from foreign competition resulted in the growth of manufacturing sectors. This created jobs for the local population, reduced unemployment, and contributed to overall economic development.

Stimulation of Domestic Industries

The protectionist policies of mercantilism stimulated the growth of domestic industries. By restricting imports and providing support to domestic producers, countries were able to nurture their own manufacturing capabilities. This led to the development of industries that were competitive on the international stage and contributed to the overall economic strength of the nation.

Negative Effects of Mercantilism on Trade

Imbalance in Trade Relations

While mercantilism aimed to create trade surpluses, it often resulted in imbalanced trade relations. Countries focused on exporting goods and accumulating wealth, often at the expense of their trading partners. This led to tensions and conflicts as nations engaged in economic rivalries and sought to maximize their own interests.

Inefficiencies and Market Distortions

The trade policies of mercantilism often led to inefficiencies and market distortions. Protectionist measures, such as high tariffs and import restrictions, created artificial barriers to trade. This prevented the free flow of goods and services and hindered the development of a more efficient and globally integrated market.

Retardation of Economic Growth

While mercantilism may have brought short-term benefits, it ultimately hindered long-term economic growth. The focus on accumulation of bullion and protection of domestic industries limited the potential for innovation, competition, and productivity gains. This constrained economic development and held back countries from fully realizing their economic potential.

Criticism of Mercantilism

Zero-Sum Nature of Mercantilism

One major criticism of mercantilism is its zero-sum nature. The pursuit of trade surpluses and accumulation of wealth by one country often came at the expense of others. This led to a perception that mercantilism was a purely self-interested approach to international trade, with little consideration for the mutual benefits that can be derived from cooperation and exchange.

Limited Focus on Consumption

Another criticism of mercantilism is its limited focus on consumption. The emphasis on export promotion and accumulation of wealth prioritized production and trade, often at the expense of domestic consumption. This resulted in a skewed allocation of resources and placed a heavy burden on the population, as they were required to prioritize production for export rather than meeting their own consumption needs.

Emerging Alternatives to Mercantilism

Towards the end of the 18th century, alternatives to mercantilism began to emerge. The Enlightenment period, with its emphasis on reason and individual rights, laid the foundation for new economic ideas. Philosophers such as Adam Smith challenged the mercantilist model and advocated for free trade and the principles of the invisible hand. These alternative ideas gradually gained acceptance and paved the way for the transition from mercantilism to free trade.

Transition from Mercantilism to Free Trade

Enlightenment and Free Trade Ideals

The Enlightenment period brought forth ideas that challenged the tenets of mercantilism. Philosophers and economists began to argue for the benefits of free trade and the principles of laissez-faire capitalism. They believed that unrestricted trade and market competition would lead to greater overall prosperity and individual freedom.

Adam Smith and the Wealth of Nations

Adam Smith, an influential figure of the Enlightenment, published “The Wealth of Nations” in 1776. In this seminal work, Smith criticized the policies of mercantilism and advocated for free trade as a means to promote economic growth and maximize welfare. He emphasized the importance of individual self-interest, competition, and the role of the market in allocating resources efficiently.

The Rise of Liberal Economic Thinking

The ideas promoted by Adam Smith and other proponents of free trade gained traction in the following centuries. Liberal economic thinking, with its emphasis on free markets, limited government intervention, and the promotion of international trade, became increasingly influential. This led to the gradual shift away from mercantilism and the emergence of free trade as the dominant economic paradigm.

Modern Implications of Mercantilism

Protectionist Trade Policies

While the period of mercantilism has long passed, its influence can still be seen in modern trade policies. Protectionist measures such as tariffs, quotas, and subsidies are often employed by nations to protect domestic industries and safeguard national interests. This reflects some persistent elements of mercantilist thinking in contemporary economic policy.

Geopolitical Considerations

Mercantilism was not solely driven by economic motives. It was also influenced by geopolitical considerations, such as the desire for territorial expansion and political power. In modern times, geopolitical factors continue to shape trade policies and economic relations between countries. Strategic considerations, national security concerns, and geopolitical rivalries can all influence trade dynamics.

Critics of Globalization

Mercantilism planted the seeds of skepticism towards globalization and the liberalization of trade. Some critics argue that unfettered free trade can lead to the exploitation of workers, environmental degradation, and concentration of economic power. These concerns have contributed to a resurgence of protectionist sentiment and calls for reevaluating the impacts of globalization.

Lessons from Mercantilism for Today’s Trade Policies

Balancing National Interests and Global Cooperation

The experience of mercantilism serves as a reminder that trade policies need to strike a balance between protecting national interests and promoting global cooperation. Nations must recognize the importance of a mutually beneficial framework for international trade while addressing domestic concerns and safeguarding national industries.

Addressing Trade Imbalances

Mercantilism highlights the potential pitfalls of imbalanced trade relations. It is crucial for nations to address trade imbalances through dialogue, negotiation, and fair trade practices. Engaging in cooperative efforts to reduce trade deficits and surpluses can contribute to stability and sustainable economic growth.

Promoting Fair and Inclusive Growth

Mercantilism’s focus on accumulating wealth at the national level disregarded the disparities and inequalities that can arise from such an approach. Today, there is a need to ensure that trade policies promote fair and inclusive growth, taking into account the interests of all stakeholders, including workers, consumers, and the environment.


Mercantilism shaped the economic landscape of the past, leaving behind a legacy with both positive and negative implications. While it promoted the development of strong national economies and stimulated domestic industries, it also led to trade imbalances, market distortions, and hindered long-term economic growth.

The transition from mercantilism to free trade marked a significant shift towards a more cooperative and inclusive global economic system. However, the modern implications of mercantilism remind us of the need to strike a balance between national interests and the benefits of global cooperation in shaping trade policies that are fair and sustainable.


Comments are closed.